Hello, bloggers! Yesterday your fearless prophets met with a really nice gentleman from Representative Niki Tsongas's office. Neither he nor Ms. Tsongas are the "Devil's Advocate" referenced in the title of the post!
We trekked out of the city to Lowell, where Ms. Tsongas's district office is located. Anthony (not our fellow prophet but the staffperson with whom we met) showed us into the newly furbished conference room. We heaped on the charm and the facts--facts about current legislation at the state and national levels, the information we have linked on the panel here at the blog. We also gave him this link as we spoke about how the U.S. stacks up against other developed nations (as well as some developing nations). He listened patiently, making notes and seeming duly interested in what we had to say as we discussed the fluidity of "family" these days and the needs our families encounter in this country so devoted to "family values." I spoke passionately about the concerns of my friends who recently had children and who are currently expecting. I felt confidant in my conviction. Clearly, the federal government should lead the way in offering paid leave for parents of newborns! There. We had won our case. Who could ignore the facts?!
Then he spoke: "I have to ask the Devil's Advocate question now. How do you think the American public will respond to a bill that offers paid leave for federal employees, when that money will come from taxpayers?" At first, I felt a little deflated. Then it came to me. I explained to him: Sure, some people are going to give a little flack. It's hard to pinch that penny to see someone else get benefits you feel you should have or you feel don't pertain to you. But if the government presents a united front and shows this market-driven country the productivity benefits of offering paid parental leave, they will be likely to follow suit. Starbucks has already learned the benefits of happy employees who have insurance, 401k and stock options. People who feel their families are well cared for are happier, more productive, and more loyal employees. But for me, there is more to it than productivity flow charts. So, I continued. You could put it to the public this way. Who doesn't know a child? Who doesn't have a niece, nephew, grandchild, or friend's child about whom they care? And who doesn't want those children they know to have every fighting chance? Part of giving these children every chance is allowing them to be home with their parents longer in those early developmental stages, when so much learning and growth happens. Children who stay home longer can build strong immune systems, be taught one-on-one by their parents, and can develop more fully before being shuffled into a daycare system to be cared for by others. Daycares are great and essential, but if given the opportunity, parents are more likely to want to be more hands-on, especially during the early stages. Underdeveloped immune systems can lead to more doctor bills and unpaid leave on the part of the parents and possible development setbacks on the part of the children. Who wants that for the children they know and love?
At some point in the discussion, I expressed to staffperson Anthony my own reservations at the beginning of this project. At first, I was just doing it for school. Now, though, I have lots of friends and family who have brought or are bringing children into this world. I want better rights for those I love--parents and children alike. This is no longer an abstract class project for me. This is a definitive stand for social justice. I hope you all will join us in this fight.
Shalom, bloggers!
Showing posts with label Boston University. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Boston University. Show all posts
Thursday, November 15, 2007
Sunday, November 11, 2007
Letter of Prophecy
Hello, bloggers! In preparation for our upcoming meeting, we have created a form letter that will not only be given to our distinguished Congresswoman's staff but will also be forward to some leading businesses, such as Starbucks Coffee Co. and Wal-Mart. This letter will be modified slightly for each audience, but we are hoping to reach as many people as possible to begin this important conversation regarding parental leave reform. Here is our letter:
To Whom It May Concern:
We are a group of students from Boston University School of Theology. We are ministers and scholars writing with a concern for America’s families. The issue of parental leave has not often been discussed in recent years, and yet it is an issue that is of imminent importance. The arrival of a child should be a time of great joy for a family, but all too often it is instead a time of worry and stress. Under America’s current parental leave policy, a new parent may take only twelve weeks of leave or they risk losing their job, and the reality is that new parents sometimes lose their jobs despite this promised minimum leave time. There is no promise of pay during this leave time. America currently has the worst parental leave policy in the developed world. This puts undue strains on both parents and children as parents must return to work in order to make ends meet and are forced to leave their children in the care of strangers. Childcare workers, while generally loving and compassionate, simply cannot provide infants with the kind of one on one care they need to ensure proper development.
Under the current policy, parents use a combination of sick and vacation leave if they wish to receive pay during their leave time. If they do not have enough sick and vacation days, they must survive without pay. This creates an unsafe situation for new infants for, if the child becomes sick once their parent returns to work, the parent may not have any way to take off work to care for them. This is especially problematic for single parents. The policy as it stands now puts undue financial burdens on new parents and this can have nothing but a negative effect on their newborn child. This policy is particularly punitive for impoverished families who literally may not be able to afford losing either parent’s pay for any amount of time.
America’s current parental leave policy is unjust. It creates unsafe environments for newborns and places undue stress on new parents. America’s families are its heart and soul. We know that you care deeply for families and our sincere hope is that you will be willing to work for children and parents to have happier, healthier lives. We know that you care for America’s children and our hope is that you will work to give them every advantage possible, particularly in the earliest days and weeks of their lives. It is for these reasons that we are requesting that America adopt a better, less punitive, and more just parental leave policy: because America’s families and children are counting on it.
Sincerely,
“The Second Isaiahs”
To Whom It May Concern:
We are a group of students from Boston University School of Theology. We are ministers and scholars writing with a concern for America’s families. The issue of parental leave has not often been discussed in recent years, and yet it is an issue that is of imminent importance. The arrival of a child should be a time of great joy for a family, but all too often it is instead a time of worry and stress. Under America’s current parental leave policy, a new parent may take only twelve weeks of leave or they risk losing their job, and the reality is that new parents sometimes lose their jobs despite this promised minimum leave time. There is no promise of pay during this leave time. America currently has the worst parental leave policy in the developed world. This puts undue strains on both parents and children as parents must return to work in order to make ends meet and are forced to leave their children in the care of strangers. Childcare workers, while generally loving and compassionate, simply cannot provide infants with the kind of one on one care they need to ensure proper development.
Under the current policy, parents use a combination of sick and vacation leave if they wish to receive pay during their leave time. If they do not have enough sick and vacation days, they must survive without pay. This creates an unsafe situation for new infants for, if the child becomes sick once their parent returns to work, the parent may not have any way to take off work to care for them. This is especially problematic for single parents. The policy as it stands now puts undue financial burdens on new parents and this can have nothing but a negative effect on their newborn child. This policy is particularly punitive for impoverished families who literally may not be able to afford losing either parent’s pay for any amount of time.
America’s current parental leave policy is unjust. It creates unsafe environments for newborns and places undue stress on new parents. America’s families are its heart and soul. We know that you care deeply for families and our sincere hope is that you will be willing to work for children and parents to have happier, healthier lives. We know that you care for America’s children and our hope is that you will work to give them every advantage possible, particularly in the earliest days and weeks of their lives. It is for these reasons that we are requesting that America adopt a better, less punitive, and more just parental leave policy: because America’s families and children are counting on it.
Sincerely,
“The Second Isaiahs”
Labels:
Boston University,
Congress,
laws,
maternity leave,
prophecy,
prophet,
Starbucks,
Wal-Mart
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)